Disclaimer: This analysis is strictly a theoretical legal and constitutional examination of a specific hypothetical scenario. It does not reflect on any specific political event, current government, or individual.

7 days ago

Constitutional Law5 min read

Can anyone Protest in India? The Legal Reality

Disclaimer: This article is strictly a legal and constitutional analysis. It is not a political statement, nor endorse or oppose any individual, ideology, or movement. References any person are used purely as a case study to explain the application of Indian citizenship and immigration laws.

7 days ago

General5 min read

What exactly is a praecipe in Court?

-by Mr. Prathamesh Nikam

29 days ago

Constitutional Law10 min read

Child Rights and Constitutionalism

- written by Mr.Sadanand Chandrakant Dhikale, Lawyer

about 1 month ago

General5 min read

“ We the people of India”…… Original Sovereign

Authored by : Daniel Bhaskar Kamble,BALLB 2 year and Co.Authored by: Prof. Mayuri Rawat,Faculty,Lokmanya Tilak Law College.

about 2 months ago

General5 min read

The Right to Privacy post Puttaswamy: Has India's Data Protection Kept pace with its own constitutional precedent?

-Written by Ms. Swara Sanjay Sagar , S.Y.LL.B , KC Law college

about 2 months ago

View All Articles →

Stay Updated

Legal Current Affairs

Recent Legal Developments

Breaking

One Word, Three Months, and a Question for the Constitution: The Supreme Court Revisits Muslim Divorce Safeguards

Introduction Nine years after the Supreme Court struck down instant triple talaq, the law on unilateral divorce among Muslims is back before it. On October 16, 2026, a bench of CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi issued notice to the Centre and other respondents on a petition seeking uniform, mandatory procedural safeguards for all modes of ‘talaq’ under Muslim personal law. The petition is tied to a larger question: is Talaq-e-Hasan constitutionally valid?

Breaking

When Celebration Becomes Contamination: Bombay High Court on Firecrackers and the Right to Breathe

Introduction Every festive season, Indian cities fill with light, sound and smoke. For many families, firecrackers are part of the celebration. For children, senior citizens and patients, they can mean a season of coughing, breathlessness and sleepless nights. On October 15, 2026, the Bombay High Court addressed this tension in In Re: Noise and Environmental Pollution v. State of Maharashtra (Suo Motu PIL No. 1 of 2026). It ruled that the ban on bursting firecrackers on public roads applies to every festival, all year, across Maharashtra.

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of YES Bank’s ₹8,415 Crore AT-1 Bond Write-Off

Case: YES Bank v. Axis Trusteeship Civil Appeal No. 3182 of 2025 Bench: Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Augustine George Masih

Who Has Jurisdiction Over the Flydubai FZ1073 Attack?

UAE Holds Primary Jurisdiction Over Flydubai FZ1073 Attack, But Five Nations Stake a Claim. An alleged mid-air terror plot aboard Flydubai Flight FZ1073 — in which the co-pilot is accused of attempting to crash the aircraft before it reached Tel Aviv — has triggered a rare, multi-country jurisdictional contest, pulling in aviation treaty law, counter-terrorism statutes, and competing national interests across the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Oman, and India.

Breaking